The music, people and stupid moments that make up the nightlife
I download music. Much of it (most of it) is legal, like promo mp3s from artist sites and occasionally the
free iTunes songs with winning Pepsi bottle caps. The only mp3s I have paid for were the
Data Panik (formerly bis) songs that were released on a limited 7" that would have cost a fortune to ship from Scotland.
Illegal mp3s, well, I download those too, but they have to lie in a politically grey area. My criteria for downloading these are as follows:
- The release is out of print domestically, or otherwise impossible to find. The Pop Group's "Y" and Killer Pussy's "Bikini Wax" are examples of this.
- I already own the release on vinyl, and don't want to go through the tedium of recording it onto my hard drive.
- The release has different songs on each format. Say I buy Alcachofa on vinyl, I'm not about to buy it again on CD for one or two different songs.
- I bought the album as an expensive import, and it gets re-released domestically with extra songs that I don't feel are worth $13 by themselves.
- My hard copy of the release gets damaged. Downloading is like backing up your files in this sense.
In the first case, if the album sees a reissue, I'll most likely purchase it. I would like to support these bands, but the unavailability of their work prevents me from doing so. #2 is no different from taping your records to play in the car, so I see nothing wrong with that. #3 is a case of the artist getting their just desserts. I'll support you up to a certain point, but I won't let you take advantage of me. #4 I have the most trouble with ethically, as my downloading the bonus songs prevents the domestic label from getting a return on their investment. But then, If I didn't buy the import in the first place, would they even be able to justify releasing the album here? I'm the reason they saw a market for the album to begin with. #5 is no different from making a backup, only a retroactive one. Seems perfectly legit to me.
On the other hand, if the
RIAA were really so uptight about artists not getting paid for every person who hears a given release, wouldn't they try to fight the sale of used CDs? The only people making money on those are the sellers, not the artists, and every store (even the large chains and online retailers) sells them. I'm sure used purchases cut into sales of new releases just as much as mp3s do...